Assessment tools used in the evaluation must be varied, nondiscriminatory, and administered in the student's native language where feasible.

Assessment tools used in the evaluation must be varied, nondiscriminatory, and administered in the student's native language where feasible.

• A. False
• B. Only for students with language issues
• C. In no circumstance
• D. True

Answer: (D)

This is true. When evaluating a student for special education, the process must use a variety of assessment tools and strategies, not rely on a single test. This variety helps create a complete and accurate picture of the student’s strengths and needs and reduces the risk that results are biased by the format or content of one test. The procedures must be nondiscriminatory, meaning they should not disadvantage the student because of race, culture, language, or disability. Administering the assessments in the student’s native language or mode of communication, to the extent feasible, helps ensure that language differences do not mask true abilities or needs. If a native-language version isn’t available, professionals should use the best feasible alternative and document the rationale, aiming for fairness and validity in the evaluation.

This is true. When evaluating a student for special education, the process must use a variety of assessment tools and strategies, not rely on a single test. This variety helps create a complete and accurate picture of the student’s strengths and needs and reduces the risk that results are biased by the format or content of one test. The procedures must be nondiscriminatory, meaning they should not disadvantage the student because of race, culture, language, or disability. Administering the assessments in the student’s native language or mode of communication, to the extent feasible, helps ensure that language differences do not mask true abilities or needs. If a native-language version isn’t available, professionals should use the best feasible alternative and document the rationale, aiming for fairness and validity in the evaluation.